<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Classic Rock Prog Special: HFoS Thinks&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://headfullofsnow.com/classic-rock-prog-special-hfos-thinks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://headfullofsnow.com/classic-rock-prog-special-hfos-thinks/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 23:41:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffman</title>
		<link>http://headfullofsnow.com/classic-rock-prog-special-hfos-thinks/comment-page-1/#comment-833</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 02:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headfullofsnow.com/?p=462#comment-833</guid>
		<description>Fraid I fall into that bracket of younger writer, as I wasn&#039;t even born when the stuff I review first came out. Even so, I hope I&#039;m free from inaccuracies and unintentional omissions. 

I agree that &#039;Record Collector&#039; is a quality read and should perhaps try and get it more often - trouble is finding the time to slot it in with everything else currently on the plate. 

Thanks, as always, Martin. Your contributions bring an extra, firsthand depth to the proceedings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fraid I fall into that bracket of younger writer, as I wasn&#8217;t even born when the stuff I review first came out. Even so, I hope I&#8217;m free from inaccuracies and unintentional omissions. </p>
<p>I agree that &#8216;Record Collector&#8217; is a quality read and should perhaps try and get it more often &#8211; trouble is finding the time to slot it in with everything else currently on the plate. </p>
<p>Thanks, as always, Martin. Your contributions bring an extra, firsthand depth to the proceedings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Westmacott</title>
		<link>http://headfullofsnow.com/classic-rock-prog-special-hfos-thinks/comment-page-1/#comment-829</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Westmacott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 20:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headfullofsnow.com/?p=462#comment-829</guid>
		<description>I saw a comment reportedly from prog rock scion Robert Wyatt recently that went something like...&quot;Progressive Rock? - it was rather a silly term really.  What could be more progressive than Bach, Handel and Haydn?&quot;  
Oh well, when you&#039;re considering things within that sort of time frame..........

Haven&#039;t shelled out for a copy of &#039;Classic Rock&#039; or its offshoots yet - I only tend to buy the unsealed stuff - and &#039;Record Collector&#039; is one of the few mags I do occasionally buy where I can read the whole thing from cover to cover and find it all interesting. Big problem of course is that today&#039;s younger writers didn&#039;t experience the prog era, so fill their pieces with inaccuracies &amp; omissions without conveying the huge impact these groups, sounds and surrounding culture had at the time....

I&#039;ll try to get Borders to find me a copy of &#039;Shindig&#039; - but best by far of course was &#039;Beat Instrumental&#039; magazine with its concise, snazzy, poppy slant, brilliant photos, and promo ads of naked ladies draped over Simms-Watts 100watt amplifier stacks.......!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw a comment reportedly from prog rock scion Robert Wyatt recently that went something like&#8230;&#8221;Progressive Rock? &#8211; it was rather a silly term really.  What could be more progressive than Bach, Handel and Haydn?&#8221;<br />
Oh well, when you&#8217;re considering things within that sort of time frame&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>Haven&#8217;t shelled out for a copy of &#8216;Classic Rock&#8217; or its offshoots yet &#8211; I only tend to buy the unsealed stuff &#8211; and &#8216;Record Collector&#8217; is one of the few mags I do occasionally buy where I can read the whole thing from cover to cover and find it all interesting. Big problem of course is that today&#8217;s younger writers didn&#8217;t experience the prog era, so fill their pieces with inaccuracies &amp; omissions without conveying the huge impact these groups, sounds and surrounding culture had at the time&#8230;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll try to get Borders to find me a copy of &#8216;Shindig&#8217; &#8211; but best by far of course was &#8216;Beat Instrumental&#8217; magazine with its concise, snazzy, poppy slant, brilliant photos, and promo ads of naked ladies draped over Simms-Watts 100watt amplifier stacks&#8230;&#8230;.!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
