<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Five Must-hear Jethro Tull Albums</title>
	<atom:link href="http://headfullofsnow.com/musthear-jethro-tull-albums/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://headfullofsnow.com/musthear-jethro-tull-albums/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:20:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffman</title>
		<link>http://headfullofsnow.com/musthear-jethro-tull-albums/comment-page-1/#comment-1294</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 01:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headfullofsnow.com/?p=1601#comment-1294</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re not the first to say that, and thinking about it, you&#039;re probably right.

If I was to rewrite this list, I&#039;d probably forfeit &#039;Minstrel...&#039; in favour of &#039;Benefit&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re not the first to say that, and thinking about it, you&#8217;re probably right.</p>
<p>If I was to rewrite this list, I&#8217;d probably forfeit &#8216;Minstrel&#8230;&#8217; in favour of &#8216;Benefit&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Metawampe</title>
		<link>http://headfullofsnow.com/musthear-jethro-tull-albums/comment-page-1/#comment-1289</link>
		<dc:creator>Metawampe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 01:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headfullofsnow.com/?p=1601#comment-1289</guid>
		<description>I thought Benefit should have been on the list.  Good to excellent songs and I listened to it a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Benefit should have been on the list.  Good to excellent songs and I listened to it a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffman</title>
		<link>http://headfullofsnow.com/musthear-jethro-tull-albums/comment-page-1/#comment-1189</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 23:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headfullofsnow.com/?p=1601#comment-1189</guid>
		<description>Thanks Joe, good to have you on board. 

As much as I like &lt;em&gt;Songs From the Wood&lt;/em&gt;, I tend not to find it maintaining the standard set by the albums listed here. If I were to extend the list I&#039;d place &lt;em&gt;Benefit&lt;/em&gt; next (on a clear day, with no following wind, I&#039;d even rate it above &lt;em&gt;Minstrel...&lt;/em&gt;), then &lt;em&gt;Songs From the Wood&lt;/em&gt;. Of course, this is mere personal preference, as these 70&#039;s albums were all pretty essential in their own way.

You should really give &lt;em&gt;Heavy Horses&lt;/em&gt; another go. Particularly the title track, which, for my money, is one of the progressive rock all-time greats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Joe, good to have you on board. </p>
<p>As much as I like <em>Songs From the Wood</em>, I tend not to find it maintaining the standard set by the albums listed here. If I were to extend the list I&#8217;d place <em>Benefit</em> next (on a clear day, with no following wind, I&#8217;d even rate it above <em>Minstrel&#8230;</em>), then <em>Songs From the Wood</em>. Of course, this is mere personal preference, as these 70&#8242;s albums were all pretty essential in their own way.</p>
<p>You should really give <em>Heavy Horses</em> another go. Particularly the title track, which, for my money, is one of the progressive rock all-time greats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Higham</title>
		<link>http://headfullofsnow.com/musthear-jethro-tull-albums/comment-page-1/#comment-1188</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Higham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headfullofsnow.com/?p=1601#comment-1188</guid>
		<description>Very nice site (discovered via Sid Smith) and plenty of interesting reviews, I&#039;ll certainly be popping by to read more at a later date. 

Whilst just flitting through the reviews I was rather curious to see what you thought were/are Jethro Tull&#039;s finest moments. I don&#039;t really know the Heavy Horses album, but I&#039;ll take a listen after your remarks. However, I am surprised that Heavy Horses made it in over &#039;Songs from the Wood&#039;. I feel that this album really was an excellent set of songs and the usual arrangements. For me it&#039;s the next best album after &#039;Minstrel in the Gallery&#039;, which I found was probably their best collection of songs, and a very nice mixture of acoustic and electric songs/arrangements. 

All in all another great point for Jethro Tull was their ability to add humor to the whole thing, a quality often missing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice site (discovered via Sid Smith) and plenty of interesting reviews, I&#8217;ll certainly be popping by to read more at a later date. </p>
<p>Whilst just flitting through the reviews I was rather curious to see what you thought were/are Jethro Tull&#8217;s finest moments. I don&#8217;t really know the Heavy Horses album, but I&#8217;ll take a listen after your remarks. However, I am surprised that Heavy Horses made it in over &#8216;Songs from the Wood&#8217;. I feel that this album really was an excellent set of songs and the usual arrangements. For me it&#8217;s the next best album after &#8216;Minstrel in the Gallery&#8217;, which I found was probably their best collection of songs, and a very nice mixture of acoustic and electric songs/arrangements. </p>
<p>All in all another great point for Jethro Tull was their ability to add humor to the whole thing, a quality often missing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

