<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Incredible String Band &#8211; The Hangman&#8217;s Beautiful Daughter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://headfullofsnow.com/the-incredible-string-band-the-hangmans-beautiful-daughter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://headfullofsnow.com/the-incredible-string-band-the-hangmans-beautiful-daughter/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 13:34:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: rich</title>
		<link>http://headfullofsnow.com/the-incredible-string-band-the-hangmans-beautiful-daughter/comment-page-1/#comment-929</link>
		<dc:creator>rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 10:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headfullofsnow.com/?p=218#comment-929</guid>
		<description>Your review is really very silly.  Robin Williamson is a fine musician and songwriter to this day, and that you can&#039;t spot it does rather condemn you.  Also, &#039;middle class&#039; may be a pejorative term you use about today, probably incorrectly, given the rest of this review, but has very little relevance to, or had it in, 1968.  Talking bollocks is always possible in blogland, but it isn&#039;t compulsory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your review is really very silly.  Robin Williamson is a fine musician and songwriter to this day, and that you can&#8217;t spot it does rather condemn you.  Also, &#8216;middle class&#8217; may be a pejorative term you use about today, probably incorrectly, given the rest of this review, but has very little relevance to, or had it in, 1968.  Talking bollocks is always possible in blogland, but it isn&#8217;t compulsory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffman</title>
		<link>http://headfullofsnow.com/the-incredible-string-band-the-hangmans-beautiful-daughter/comment-page-1/#comment-819</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 02:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headfullofsnow.com/?p=218#comment-819</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Martin. For your kind words and for your contributions here. Both are certainly welcome. 

Haha, I see what you mean about the dog, one can only hope that the RSPCA stepped in before so much as a sarangi was strummed or a vocal strangled. A very different kettle of fish to Soft Machine, eh? 

It ably demonstrates the fine line between getting it right and getting it wrong, to the extent that Kaleidoscope (the British one that went on to become Fairfield Parlour) sound very similar to the Incredible String Band in places but are an absolute galaxy apart with regards to quality. I also have a liking for Dr. Strangely Strange - the second album, Heavy Petting, anyways - who also bear similarities to the dreaded String Band. 

I think it&#039;s like you say, the String Band stem from the same right-on, middle/upper class tofu mentality that&#039;s still around today and just got lucky, whereas the other two I mentioned were made up of actual musicians with an ear for a tune and the ability to sidestep the more toe-curling of embarrassing lyrics.

Thanks for the heads up on the Comsat Angels - I&#039;ll have to give them a look. The latest Shindig magazine (don&#039;t know if you&#039;re acquainted) came with a free CD showcasing twenty new bands playing the sort of stuff that would&#039;ve been around in the in the late 60s/70s. I was pleasantly surprised by it.  A few decent acts on there worthy of further investigation.

Thanks again, Martin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Martin. For your kind words and for your contributions here. Both are certainly welcome. </p>
<p>Haha, I see what you mean about the dog, one can only hope that the RSPCA stepped in before so much as a sarangi was strummed or a vocal strangled. A very different kettle of fish to Soft Machine, eh? </p>
<p>It ably demonstrates the fine line between getting it right and getting it wrong, to the extent that Kaleidoscope (the British one that went on to become Fairfield Parlour) sound very similar to the Incredible String Band in places but are an absolute galaxy apart with regards to quality. I also have a liking for Dr. Strangely Strange &#8211; the second album, Heavy Petting, anyways &#8211; who also bear similarities to the dreaded String Band. </p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s like you say, the String Band stem from the same right-on, middle/upper class tofu mentality that&#8217;s still around today and just got lucky, whereas the other two I mentioned were made up of actual musicians with an ear for a tune and the ability to sidestep the more toe-curling of embarrassing lyrics.</p>
<p>Thanks for the heads up on the Comsat Angels &#8211; I&#8217;ll have to give them a look. The latest Shindig magazine (don&#8217;t know if you&#8217;re acquainted) came with a free CD showcasing twenty new bands playing the sort of stuff that would&#8217;ve been around in the in the late 60s/70s. I was pleasantly surprised by it.  A few decent acts on there worthy of further investigation.</p>
<p>Thanks again, Martin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Westmacott</title>
		<link>http://headfullofsnow.com/the-incredible-string-band-the-hangmans-beautiful-daughter/comment-page-1/#comment-818</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Westmacott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 03:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headfullofsnow.com/?p=218#comment-818</guid>
		<description>Wow! - spot on &amp; brilliantly written too (I&#039;m still laughing). My elder sister subjected this extended aural torture on me for about 18 months while she courted a nerdy anorak-ish American student fan of this tone-deaf Tribe From Hell.  

But consider - if this particular lot hadn&#039;t made such an appalling record, then some other extended family of Lincoln-green clad create-your-own-reality hippy-folkies would surely have done, as it was not uncommon (in London certainly) at that time to find communal, arty, right-on well-to-do &#039;families&#039; (typically within a large middle-class house) that saw the &#039;Love, Peace &amp; Freedom&#039; ethic as beginning at home.  

And of course everyone within that social milieu could lay hands on a guitar and a Dylan album somewhere in the house - &amp; usually a copy of A.S. Neil&#039;s &#039;Summerhill&#039; or Richard Neville&#039;s &#039;Playpower&#039; as manifestos (both great books, incidentally - I don&#039;t see any books performing the same role for today&#039;s teenage generation?).  
 
&quot;Lethal to innocent wildlife&quot; ?   Well, ... take another look at that album cover - I do believe I see a distinct look of foreboding on Fido&#039;s face! 

As primary school kids c.1962 we had a hamper-load of around 200 45&#039;s given to us, one of which was a folk single called &quot;Out After Ale&quot;, the chorus of which was -

&quot;Sing Whoops-A-Saa, Tra-La-La-La, She Thought He&#039;d Gone Out To Drink Ale&quot;  (!)  

p.s. thanks for a great website with great writing - I look forward to exploring it more fully at ridiculous hours.  And the one rock band post-1979 that I&#039;ve followed assiduously are the Comsat Angels - their 1996 &#039;My Minds&#039; Eye&#039; (available on Renascent) is an absolute classic.     

Martin Westmacott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! &#8211; spot on &amp; brilliantly written too (I&#8217;m still laughing). My elder sister subjected this extended aural torture on me for about 18 months while she courted a nerdy anorak-ish American student fan of this tone-deaf Tribe From Hell.  </p>
<p>But consider &#8211; if this particular lot hadn&#8217;t made such an appalling record, then some other extended family of Lincoln-green clad create-your-own-reality hippy-folkies would surely have done, as it was not uncommon (in London certainly) at that time to find communal, arty, right-on well-to-do &#8216;families&#8217; (typically within a large middle-class house) that saw the &#8216;Love, Peace &amp; Freedom&#8217; ethic as beginning at home.  </p>
<p>And of course everyone within that social milieu could lay hands on a guitar and a Dylan album somewhere in the house &#8211; &amp; usually a copy of A.S. Neil&#8217;s &#8216;Summerhill&#8217; or Richard Neville&#8217;s &#8216;Playpower&#8217; as manifestos (both great books, incidentally &#8211; I don&#8217;t see any books performing the same role for today&#8217;s teenage generation?).  </p>
<p>&#8220;Lethal to innocent wildlife&#8221; ?   Well, &#8230; take another look at that album cover &#8211; I do believe I see a distinct look of foreboding on Fido&#8217;s face! </p>
<p>As primary school kids c.1962 we had a hamper-load of around 200 45&#8242;s given to us, one of which was a folk single called &#8220;Out After Ale&#8221;, the chorus of which was -</p>
<p>&#8220;Sing Whoops-A-Saa, Tra-La-La-La, She Thought He&#8217;d Gone Out To Drink Ale&#8221;  (!)  </p>
<p>p.s. thanks for a great website with great writing &#8211; I look forward to exploring it more fully at ridiculous hours.  And the one rock band post-1979 that I&#8217;ve followed assiduously are the Comsat Angels &#8211; their 1996 &#8216;My Minds&#8217; Eye&#8217; (available on Renascent) is an absolute classic.     </p>
<p>Martin Westmacott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
